🔗 Share this article

As the existentially challenged Tories gathers in Manchester for its yearly gathering, it has plenty to consider regarding its next steps. There is uncertainty if a road forward is available. These are challenging circumstances for a political party that now has almost nothing, if anything, fresh or distinctive to say to the public.

The Missed Opportunity

The situation might have been markedly improved if concrete steps had been made on an policy focus that resonates with people nationwide: Social mobility. Yet Boris Johnson’s government did not possess the basic understanding on how to turn the trendy talk on social mobility into actual implementation. For the two years after the general election, it argued over what the phrase actually signified.

I was perplexed, because I had clearly defined for Johnson what social mobility entailed when we initially discussed about it during the contest for party leader. The expression was language I created and used at the DfE to talk about equal opportunity. It was our core mission, and its meaning is unambiguous: social mobility is the approach by which we attain equal access – not through reducing chances away from those who already have it, but rather by extending options to those that don’t.

The Core Concept

An additional vital education department term we used, “talent is spread evenly across our country, yet chances are not”, represented another a deliberate expression, embodying the dual components of a equal opportunity plan. First, talent spread evenly but not nurtured uniformly through our learning institutions. Additionally, access not provided uniformly by businesses or our economy. Therefore, learning and employment were essential to achieving stronger social mobility. This was an mission about the community framework of our country – fostering individual capabilities and linking them with prospects.

The Actual Outcome

How did the social mobility agenda turn into under the previous government? Local investment schemes administered out of the the relevant ministry. Street beautification and redeveloped traffic systems. An official policy document was published nearly three years after the leadership change, which saw current strategies relabelled under the fresh social mobility slogan.

Therefore, a wider fairness strategy went unpursued, as well as all the reform that it could have inspired – in investment, business, financial planning, taxation and in place-making. And, of course, in schooling, including a university system that has become a punchbag for elected officials – although it remains the primary vehicle of life improvement for youth from modest backgrounds, like me, this country has had throughout modern times. Maybe the sole mechanism of fair chances, functioning widely.

The Role of Ambition

Hope is essential for our country to prosper. For people to have aspiration, there needs to be a credible sense that effort and reward are related; that if people dream big, they can attain. For political leadership, being able to foster a outlook of positivity about the tomorrow is crucial. Studies by the Institute for Policy Research at Bath University and others, recently released, showed that the DfE’s 12 “opportunity areas” I established during my tenure – locally targeted strategies to boosting academic achievement – led to youth in those communities being up to 18 percentage points more positive about their life ahead than those in similar areas without these initiatives in place. The evidence is clear: just making an genuine beginning on pro-social mobility policy can swiftly and beneficially change how people perceive their prospects.

Squandered Chances

Unaware of these findings, and in the throes of its post-Johnson leadership contest, in autumn 2022, the ruling party terminated the programmes. What reason would someone in those areas vote for a party that made that decision? The opportunity areas policy is a single instance of what might have become a revolutionary Tory policy platform on levelling up, but that possibility was hopelessly squandered. Approaches such as this can generate optimism and ambition. On the other hand, as the ruling party found out, breaking the promise of fair chances is the most expensive error any leadership can make. Voters punished the government for its ineffectiveness but, above all, for its broken promises on equal opportunity.

Present Circumstances

At present the baton on social mobility and fair access has been transferred to a opposition party. The previous terminology has been abandoned. The current administration has its own public messaging of “eliminating hurdles to advancement”. The party that is steadily supplanting the hapless Tories, Reform UK, also has its own message – “reindustrialisation”. This expression to talk about fresh prospects in regions like the one I come from, in my hometown. It suggests that an industrial past can reincarnate into an revitalized economy.

For voters, it must seem like a repetitive cycle. Same issue, new terminology. Yet, currently, little improvement.

The Way Forward

If Labour and Reform UK want to escape the identical outcome, each group should understand the Tories’ mistakes on levelling up; that social mobility rhetoric is simple terminology, but effective implementation of fairer outcomes is significantly more difficult. Britain’s persistently low life chances remains the key issue for our country, with the next generation unable to get a good job beginning, those putting in effort in occupations with little to show after the rent has been paid, and citizens throughout the UK without any genuine belief their next generation will be able to do improve in life than they have.

Elected officials can mention improved access repeatedly. Yet where is the party that has the comprehensive policy agenda on equal opportunity? I observe no such party. Whoever gets there first, wins. Not only for themselves, but, significantly, for a complete society that has urgently needs equal access so desperately.